<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Skydeck Blog - Latest Comments in Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.disqus.com/</link><description>Mobile Caller ID</description><atom:link href="https://skydeck.disqus.com/sailing_the_ship_of_state/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:39:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent post. We are ourselves building a finance app in Scala (which is an excellent language with great FP support), but I have to say that I somehow envy you hacking away in OCaml. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jboner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i mock your current so-called higher-order languages with my dependently typed one(s)!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raoul Duke</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to see a comparison of OCaml versus Oberon?  Oberon also imposes very, very strong interface boundaries and I've enjoyed this language immensely.  Currently, I hack in Haskell (see &lt;a href="http://www.falvotech.com/content/cut/3)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.falvotech.com/content/cut/3)"&gt;http://www.falvotech.com/co...&lt;/a&gt;, and I've had similar experiences with Haskell too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Samuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:06:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to read a sane summary of those languages. It's the conclusion I've been coming to myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sashan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why, the state space is not *that* big, it's just a 1 x 1 x ... x 1 order-(2^32)-hypercube. It has unit volume as well!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course I agree with you on the rest. But perhaps keeping the space analogy that should be "Hubble programmers"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:11:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sailing the ship of state</title><link>http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/sailing-the-ship-of-state#comment-10293272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Jake, nice article. You just pushed OCaml to the top of my "programming languages to learn" list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dsjoerg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>